心物.微觀–蔡獻友創作展

心物.微觀–蔡獻友創作展

文/策展人 張聰賢

 

盧梭(Henri Rousseau)曾說:如果上帝是在宇宙冷靜的看著人類,人更應該生活在變動世界中尋找自我,對一切關於自己知識抱持著學習與懷疑態度,為自己的存在找到價值與可能。

「心物.微觀」這個展覽,是就個人多年來對藝術家作品的觀察與理解而命題。從其「植物史」創作,作者從作品中展現出一種高度的詩性,作品如同攝影負片顯影似的,藝術家一直試著讓作品呈現出一種高度無為的狀態,如「去作者化」在作品完成之後的隱匿。過去許多作品呼應的如他者存在(being-for-other),為的是提供被認知與觀看的理解。學院技法更常將作品呈現作為一種潮流與當代表現,往往忽略了作品本身最基礎的材料物性,此次展覽藝術家以一種「以退為進」讓材料回歸自身做回它自己的態度,這是藝術家本身面對材料與畫布間的深刻體會。

從自然轉折過渡到畫布形態的存在,藝術家以一個學院走來的藝術創作者的身份,卻在創作的過程中不斷地去探究材料本身的物性,物質轉折至畫面之中後,這是一種概念性的附著於可見的尺度當下,創作是否不僅僅是作者本身的意念的存在,更是媒材經由意念而生成一種被概念還原的差異性。正如藝術家本人所言:他要讓自己退到作品外圍。或許作為一個藝術家而言,作品往往成為自己偽裝另一個自我,作品被看見同時也只是一個藝術家自我赤裸的表徵,透過物質的複製與質變,在思想的迴盪之間擺渡游離,目的在於以藝術之名征服材質的可塑特質。然而藝術家的作品內藴訴說的是一種生命觀的無為與謙融。

一切物質都不可能離開心靈,物質的存在與意義最終也是通過心靈才得以顯現其價值,相信這是一樣的道理,上帝的存在就在每一個人的心中一樣,人脫離了心靈的感受能力只能成為一個表象的肉身。這如同存在主義者所言,了解自己必須要透過內在的體驗一樣。藝術的精神所表現的也應該是個人化的創造,作品不該將使用的材料本身驅離在作品之外,而該讓材料本身以靜態的方式表達出人與物的對話關係。一如藝術家本人所言:我的繪畫基本上是在還原材料(物質)本身的特性,讓材料成為它自己的特性,而不是成為藝術的以技巧作為控制材料的手段。

 

心物.微觀–蔡獻友創作展
Mind, Minor Matter-Tsai Hsien-Yiu Solo Exhibition

策展人|張聰賢
藝術家|蔡獻友
展覽日期|2021/10/13(三) – 2021/12/05(日)
展覽時間|週三至週日 11:00-18:00
開幕茶會|2021/10/30(六) 14:00
展覽地點|102當代藝術空間

座談會|即心.微物 2021/10/30(六) 15:00-17:00
引言人|張聰賢 / 藝術工作者、獨立策展人
藝術家|蔡獻友 / 正修科技大學視覺傳達設計系教授
與談人|黃文勇 / 台南應用科技大學美術系副教授

John Berger wrote in his book Ways of Seeing: ”Seeing comes before words. The child looks and recognizes before it can speak.

“But there is also another sense in which seeing comes before words. It is seeing which establishes our place in the surrounding world; we explain that world with words, but words can never undo the fact that we are surrounded by it. The relationship between what we see and what we know is never settled.”

Thus painting is created under this uncertainty.

 

The core of my creation is about binary tension—subject versus object, continuity versus discontinuity and light versus shadow, as I search for the difference (which is unknown) that lies in the distance in between them.

Meanwhile the binary tension in subject/object, reality/fiction, continuity/discontinuity and light/shadow makes them one, for they do not exist against the other. The binary pair completes and complements each other.

And the uncertainty between them is a distance produced by time.

 

After piece of scenery (a realm unknown) is seen, it becomes a blurred image of memory, of picture and of painting. Now it is the painting itself.

 

As time goes by, I continuously force myself in a certain distance. Due to my curiosity to the unknown, I explored, experimented with and investigated the spontaneity created by automatism on my paintings in progress continuously. This is for the purpose of creating the possibility of a binary pair in tension. I ponder the distance between my thinking and my work; but this distance in itself is seeing.

 

The distance of light is not a discussion about light in physical aspect, nor is it the light from Western art history which is widely discussed. It signifies the distance that occurs in between a painting and the sight and mind of its viewer. It is the inner interpretation of the painting by its viewer.

 

I apply pearlescent silver paint for the purpose of forming this distance between viewers and paintings. This produces a polarized light effect on canvas, which varies at different viewing distance and angles. Due to this effect, viewers may shift their distance from the work and thus recognize this distance.

This awareness of distance may furthermore kindle their inner interpretation and senses, so that they can hold a dialogue or an interchange with the paintings.

 

The distance of light lies in between sight and soul.